Outcome of Medical versus Surgical Methods in Second Trimester Abortion
AbstractAims: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of medical versus the surgical methods and to determine the outcome of both the methods with respect to complications like incomplete abortion, bleeding and sepsis.
Methods: This study was conducted at BP Koirala Institue of Health Sciences. Total of 80 patients, 40 in each group were enrolled in the study. For medical abortion group, Mifepristone 200mg orally followed by Misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally were given until the patient expelled the fetus. In surgical group, cervical priming was done with Misoprostol followed by dilatation and evacuation. The outcome of both medical and surgical abortions were compared in terms of amount of blood loss and associated complications like retained placenta and sepsis.
Results: The overall complications were more in the medical group with 11.25% vs 2.5% in the surgical group (p value=0.02), with higher incidence of retained placenta (8 vs 0) and a higher amount of blood loss (129.20 +/- 20.4 ml vs 70.89 +/- 11.2 ml, p value <0.001) requiring blood transfusion.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the surgical method is a more effective and safer procedure as compared to medical method. The complication rates were lower and it was also more cost effective.
Copyright on any research article in the Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology is retained by the author(s).
The authors grant the Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Articles in the Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and it is not used for commercial purposes.